Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Tópicos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Lancet Neurol ; 22(5): 395-406, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2296631

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Generalised myasthenia gravis is a chronic, unpredictable, and debilitating rare disease, often accompanied by high treatment burden and with an unmet need for more efficacious and well tolerated treatments. Zilucoplan is a subcutaneous, self-administered macrocyclic peptide complement C5 inhibitor. We aimed to assess safety, efficacy, and tolerability of zilucoplan in patients with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (AChR)-positive generalised myasthenia gravis. METHODS: RAISE was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that was done at 75 sites in Europe, Japan, and North America. We enrolled patients (aged 18-74 years) with AChR-positive generalised myasthenia gravis (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America disease class II-IV), a myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) score of least 6, and a quantitative myasthenia gravis score of at least 12. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous zilucoplan 0·3 mg/kg once daily by self-injection, or matched placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 12 in MG-ADL score in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-dosing MG-ADL score). Safety was mainly assessed by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in all patients who had received at least one dose of zilucoplan or placebo. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04115293. An open-label extension study is ongoing (NCT04225871). FINDINGS: Between Sept 17, 2019, and Sept 10, 2021, 239 patients were screened for the study, of whom 174 (73%) were eligible. 86 (49%) patients were randomly assigned to zilucoplan 0·3 mg/kg and 88 (51%) were assigned to placebo. Patients assigned to zilucoplan showed a greater reduction in MG-ADL score from baseline to week 12, compared with those assigned to placebo (least squares mean change -4·39 [95% CI -5·28 to -3·50] vs -2·30 [-3·17 to -1·43]; least squares mean difference -2·09 [-3·24 to -0·95]; p=0·0004). TEAEs occurred in 66 (77%) patients in the zilucoplan group and in 62 (70%) patients in the placebo group. The most common TEAE was injection-site bruising (n=14 [16%] in the zilucoplan group and n=8 [9%] in the placebo group). Incidences of serious TEAEs and serious infections were similar in both groups. One patient died in each group; neither death (COVID-19 [zilucoplan] and cerebral haemorrhage [placebo]) was considered related to the study drug. INTERPRETATION: Zilucoplan treatment showed rapid and clinically meaningful improvements in myasthenia gravis-specific efficacy outcomes, had a favourable safety profile, and was well tolerated, with no major safety findings. Zilucoplan is a new potential treatment option for a broad population of patients with AChR-positive generalised myasthenia gravis. The long-term safety and efficacy of zilucoplan is being assessed in an ongoing open-label extension study. FUNDING: UCB Pharma.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Miastenia Gravis , Humanos , Actividades Cotidianas , Miastenia Gravis/tratamiento farmacológico , Complemento C5/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Journal of College Admission ; - (255):32, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2010995

RESUMEN

Student-athletes have always had additional steps in the college admission process, but the COVID-19 pandemic has brought increased competition and new NCAA rules that impact admission. Here is what counselors and admission professionals working with student-athletes need to know.

3.
Journal of College Admission ; - (250):28, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1479146

RESUMEN

Parents and guardians often have more fear than their students about the journey off to college. They are unsure about fit, cost and value, distance, health and safety, an empty nest, and more. COVID-19 has added even more factors into the mix. The pandemic drastically changed the way many colleges deliver instruction, as well as the ways students and their families evaluate prospective schools and determine a path forward. Consider these recent findings from a December 2020 survey conducted by Tallo of 30 college admission professionals. Despite promising news on the vaccine front, the pandemic remains a top concern of both students and their parents/guardians, survey results show. Although the survey sample size is small, the findings back up what counselors and admission professionals say they have witnessed this year as families embark on a college search process that's rife with new challenges.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA